Why were the Manchus so much more successful in ruling China after Essay

Why were the Manchus so much more successful in ruling China after their conquest of the Ming than their predecessors, the Mongols, were in ruling over China after the fall of the Song - Essay Example The Mongols, initially, sought to segregate themselves and maintain different cultural identities, but eventually integrated with the society and adopted many of the ways of the Chinese. By concerning itself with the maintenance of power as a conquering force, and subjugating the Chinese people under a heavy handed rule, the Manchu dynasty would be a longer, more successful rule than the Mongol dynasty. During the time of the Song dynasty in China, a great growth of the country would take place. As advances in science, the arts, and in philosophy would expand, so to did the population double in size. All of these things are signs of a thriving civilization. However, these advancements were diminished by a government that did not recognize the need for a global attitude. Expansion of the government itself did not occur in order to meet the demands of a greater population. As the country of China and its people thrived, the roots of the country, the core government, did not sustain enough strength to hold onto its nation. In an attempt to expand and promote new growth, Wang Anshi created what is known as the ‘New Laws’. â€Å"Wang not only tried to expand channels of revenue and the apparatus of local order, but explicitly argued that the state must enlarge itself and in effect absorb into an expanding bureaucracy the growing wealthy and educated elite.† (Embree, p. 348) According to Ainslee T. Embree and Carol Gluck, in their book, Asia in Western and World History, if Wang Anshi’s reforms had taken place they would have rivaled advancements made in industry and state building that did not occur again until the late 19th and early 20th century. However, after the fall of North China, Wang’s reform party would be defeated and the advanced concept of ‘growth of the state’ would end. A general lack of interest in forward motions of modernity would stagnate the growth of the country as the growth of the