Tuesday, February 26, 2019
In Twelve Angry Men Rose Shows That Doubt Is an Easier State of Mind Than Certainty Essay
Set in the sweltering summer of 1954, Reginald Roses socially insightful wanton Twelve Angry Men, illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on cardinal individuals to reach a liveness or death decision with collective solid grounds of minds hindered by individual(prenominal) hurt. At the plan of the play, rose explores the idea that interrogative is a harder state of mind than plasteredty by portraying interrogative sentence, in the guilt of the boy, as a minority view within the court board. However, as the play progresses a seed of dis commit is planted and the importance of self prejudice keep the finding of fact is removed, making it harder for the jurors to refuse their certainty in their finable verdict.At the conception of Twelve Angry Men, Rose exposes the audience to the devastating hop up in the venire room which over looks the New York sky wrinkle on what is described as the hottest day of the the family. At this tier it is revealed to th e audience the apathetic nature of jury members, uninterested in the wicked responsibility they have in deciding the fate of the 16 year old boys life and more interested with the goal of escaping the plain, oven like jury room. With each juror being blinded by the thick coat of heat In front of them a verdict of guilty becomes the born(p) state of mind and the room for reasonable doubt is eliminated from all tho one. The author, Reginald Rose displays through juror 8 that to be doubtful when ambitious a majority becomes a harder state of mind, as its non easy to stand alone against the ridicule of other at this number juror 8 initiates his campaign that we can never be certain about anything, we can only make assumptions based on the information provided.As juror 8s campaign continues, and the seed of doubt planted into the guilty minded jury members is fertilised thorough the analysing of facts the reasonable doubt slowly grows in the jurors minds, the audience begin to cr eate an understanding that doubt is an easier state of mind than certainty, as to be doubtful you are non accountable to that single view, as we are reminded in the text from juror 8 I dont know whether I believe it or not parting him from the majority but lowering the conflict, as he is not certain about the innocence of the boy sooner not feeling not comfortable to raise his hand and enchant a boy off to die without talkingabout it freshman, making the doubtful state of mind an easier sense of conscience although a harder sense to preach onto the other jury members who consist of the majority.Towards the conclusion of the play twelve angry men, doubt begins to become an easier state of mind as the persuasion of doubt is created through a range of events that after antecedently being concrete are now questioned, and the not guilty verdict is now the majority verdict, this releases the oppressively hot environment of the jury room through the delivery of rain, representing a Burs t of relief and fresh halo for the jurors. Although, Reginald Rose decisively leaves one jury member (3) who is still stuck in the train of personal prejudice and believes the kid knifed his father 6 inches into the dressing table. Juror 3s certain state of mind portrays him as the villain of twelve angry men, a man who is blinded by his own personal outside influences and is illustrated as a stubborn man with no justice when defending his view of guilty, this shows that his state of mind being guilty now becomes the harder state of mind as he is left as the minority, and could not separate personal prejudice when dealing with the fate of some others life, effecting his judgement.After juror 3 finally splits his relationship between his son and the 16 year old boy on rill a not-guilty verdict is delivered to the judge. Reginald Rose shows his intended audience at the conception of the film that doubt is the harder state of mind as juror 8 views on the boy and trial is challengi ng the majority, although throughout the progression of the play, not one juror member is able to hold his certainty, making doubt an easier state of mind as they do not have to hold a certain point of view and are not accountable to that single certain view.