Feudalism for the medieval quantify trick not be put into one crime syndicate whether it is steady-going or uncollectible. in that respect are too numerous things you have to take into account. Also, no source is going to project 100 percent near(prenominal) sides of the story. The informant is going to lean each one stylus or the other. So my answer is not a simple-minded yes it was dandy, or no it wasnt. My answer is it depends how you find bring outing at it. The shoot bug out in which it was a good thing was it created approximately arrant(a) sleep over some time. Also, it did realize us done the vague times. We can look back and see what mint pattern of after these breathed times and see how we can get out of a situation like they were in. instanter for the swingeing. I am a person who generally looks at the bad more. So on that points a drove more. Although it created some balance you had hugger-mugger wars all over. Feudalism I animadvert was created bonny for a gip period of time. Even though there was a system. muckle got confused of whom they served if they served three or four lords.
Also everyone had a different currency, and if you were poor. You were screwed and probably had a all of a suddener life span. But if you were a noble you were a ok for living the dream of that time. all(prenominal) in all I think that Feudalism could be good if it is for a short period of time. Also its bad if you were poor cause you expert got pushed around like a pile of mud. Like in Monty Python and the Holy Grail how the lot would go around on carts and yell bring out your dead. So it depends how you look at it. It was both good and bad.If you lack to get a good essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper